Public Comments – Page 18 – Valley Advocates For Responsible Development

VARD advocates for public comment at MD Conditional Use Permit Review

The real core of our concern with MD Nursery is fairness and consistency with the conditional use permit process.

Comments on Mahogany Ridge Preliminary Plat Hearing

We are pleased that Travis Thompson has volunteered to pull Mahogany Ridge from the July schedule so that he can submit more detailed and consistent maps, updated phasing plans, and clarified open space calculations.

Mahogany Ridge Preliminary Plat Hearing

VARD respectfully requests that Mahogany Ridge PUD be removed from the July 8th hearing schedule due to inconsistencies in the file which deny the public a meaningful opportunity to provide commentary as due process requires.

Click here to read VARD's second comment letter on the Canyon Creek Ranch Preliminary Application

When you are reviewing a large remote development that spans two counties, it is impossible to plan for all possible variables that may unfold in the future

Ridgeline Ranch PUD, Preliminary Plat Application

Our chief concern with this development is the high density of housing units in such a steep and rural area of the county and the location of the housing units in the high priority habitat as identified by their environmental consultants.

Traditional Neighborhood Design Overlay Zone

Our support is based in part on the proven track record of TNDs to weather the ups and downs in the market better than other kinds of development because of its mixed use and mixed price point nature.

VARD's comments on the proposed Traditional Neighborhood Design Overlay, which will be heard in a public hearing sometime in May.

Decision Makers: City of VictorTopic: VARD's comments on the proposed Traditional Neighborhood Design Overlay, which will be heard in a public hearing sometime in May. City of VictorPlanning and Zoning Commission, City Council, City StaffPO…

Trail Creek Partners LLC's request for a permit to build in the Trail Creek floodplain

VARD opposes this request for a CUP because the integrity of the floodplain will be compromised

Edge Wireless tower and non-compliance with the existing Tetonia code

Clearly, according to the zoning code, a telecommunications tower is not an allowed use in this Agricultural Zone.